The FlusterCuck Avatar

388 Notes

cultureofresistance:

onalonelyscreen:

cuntymint:

Premise One: Civilization is not and can never be sustainable. This is especially true for industrial civilization.
Premise Six: Civilization is not redeemable. This culture will not undergo any sort of voluntary transformation to a sane and sustainable way of living. If we do not put a halt to it, civilization will continue to immiserate the vast majority of humans and to degrade the planet until it (civilization, and probably the planet) collapses. The effects of this degradation will continue to harm humans and nonhumans for a very long time.
Premise Seven: The longer we wait for civilization to crash—or the longer we wait before we ourselves bring it down—the messier will be the crash, and the worse things will be for those humans and nonhumans who live during it, and for those who come after.

It is not civilization that is inherently unsustainable - it is barbarism. Civilization and Barbarism evolve together, parallel to each other. Advances in science, philosophy, art, culture, theosophy, and technology are civilization. Advances in violence, oppression, greed, ignorance, and environmental exploitation are results of barbarism. These are two distinct sets of virtues that appear to be the same thing, but nothing could be further from the truth. Those of us who are or have been civilized are crushed under the collective upholding of barbarism (Gandhi, Jesus, Buddha, MLK, etc. etc.) while the barbarians and their values are the easiest to go along with.
Individuals are creative, groups are destructive. An individual is a beacon of civilization while a group resorts to unthinking barbarism. All advances in every school, in every undertaking, have been made by individuals. Then the collective will slowly undo and misinterpret what was accomplished by one person in their solitude. It is our duty as conscious individuals to preserve these advances in civilization and protect them from the collective barbarism that will degrade them.
If society collapses, the creative advances we made must be kept. Do not blame civilization itself for the callousness and greed of blind men. In doing so, you throw away every possibility for a future that knows Unity.
Don’t throw out the baby with the bathwater - we will never live like we did 15,000 years ago.

Ah, I didn’t think I’d have to visit civilization is unsustainable 101 all over again. 
Read this, if not the entire book Endgame. 
Zoom Image

cultureofresistance:

onalonelyscreen:

cuntymint:

Premise One: Civilization is not and can never be sustainable. This is especially true for industrial civilization.

Premise Six: Civilization is not redeemable. This culture will not undergo any sort of voluntary transformation to a sane and sustainable way of living. If we do not put a halt to it, civilization will continue to immiserate the vast majority of humans and to degrade the planet until it (civilization, and probably the planet) collapses. The effects of this degradation will continue to harm humans and nonhumans for a very long time.

Premise Seven: The longer we wait for civilization to crash—or the longer we wait before we ourselves bring it down—the messier will be the crash, and the worse things will be for those humans and nonhumans who live during it, and for those who come after.

It is not civilization that is inherently unsustainable - it is barbarism. Civilization and Barbarism evolve together, parallel to each other. Advances in science, philosophy, art, culture, theosophy, and technology are civilization. Advances in violence, oppression, greed, ignorance, and environmental exploitation are results of barbarism. These are two distinct sets of virtues that appear to be the same thing, but nothing could be further from the truth. Those of us who are or have been civilized are crushed under the collective upholding of barbarism (Gandhi, Jesus, Buddha, MLK, etc. etc.) while the barbarians and their values are the easiest to go along with.

Individuals are creative, groups are destructive. An individual is a beacon of civilization while a group resorts to unthinking barbarism. All advances in every school, in every undertaking, have been made by individuals. Then the collective will slowly undo and misinterpret what was accomplished by one person in their solitude. It is our duty as conscious individuals to preserve these advances in civilization and protect them from the collective barbarism that will degrade them.

If society collapses, the creative advances we made must be kept. Do not blame civilization itself for the callousness and greed of blind men. In doing so, you throw away every possibility for a future that knows Unity.

Don’t throw out the baby with the bathwater - we will never live like we did 15,000 years ago.

Ah, I didn’t think I’d have to visit civilization is unsustainable 101 all over again. 

Read this, if not the entire book Endgame. 

Replies

Likes

  1. toughglam reblogged this from cuntymint
  2. hideousfox reblogged this from vegan-dreams
  3. cuntymint reblogged this from pantxo2112
  4. vegan-dreams reblogged this from rawrevolutionepidemic
  5. huge-ego-sorry reblogged this from lafranelea
  6. evenpoetslie reblogged this from boner-iver
  7. moniqueanne reblogged this from ekvilla
  8. ekvilla reblogged this from freesteadyb
  9. thedancingtoast reblogged this from iridially
  10. thevampiresweekend reblogged this from iridially
  11. iridially reblogged this from boner-iver
  12. m-a-l-i-b-u-u reblogged this from boner-iver
  13. boner-iver reblogged this from princerobbie
  14. kathybang reblogged this from chelchichay
  15. chelchichay reblogged this from jazstaysbitter
  16. thinx-of-a-xicana reblogged this from cuntymint
  17. toseethemfly reblogged this from cuntymint
  18. cuntymint reblogged this from pantxo2112
  19. cuntymint reblogged this from wareq and added:
    Stupid reply, yet again. The main goals aren’t simply (stupidly and selfishly) individual survival, but to a tiny degree...
  20. optimism-readjustment reblogged this from legalize--murder
  21. wareq reblogged this from cuntymint and added:
    Damn straight it’s antisocial and elitist. I know I am - but what are you? Stupid? Far from it. The point is that your...
  22. peacelovepriss reblogged this from ny4ti
  23. cuntymint reblogged this from wareq and added:
    Your rant itself was antisocial and elitist, as well as stupid and pointless.
  24. arunsballoon reblogged this from solitaryforager
  25. mr1xiii3 reblogged this from onlystreetlights
  26. onlystreetlights reblogged this from solitaryforager
  27. mthgs reblogged this from solitaryforager
  28. donetrudging reblogged this from timetoawaken
  29. abilitytoenjoyit reblogged this from solitaryforager
  30. pantxo2112 reblogged this from solitaryforager and added:
    Premisa Uno: la civilización no es ni nunca será sustentable. Es real, especialmente, para la civilización industrial....
  31. quasidoom reblogged this from legalize--murder
  32. dancingmood reblogged this from legalize--murder
  33. event-horiz0n reblogged this from solitaryforager
  34. inlovingmemorydespiteyou reblogged this from timetoawaken
  35. suminyi reblogged this from king-owl
  36. chasing-suns reblogged this from king-owl and added:
    And it’s not as if the government are ignorant to this fact. In the 70’s, a project called the venus project was...
  37. king-owl reblogged this from solitaryforager
  38. youasshats reblogged this from solitaryforager
  39. evrythingsmagic reblogged this from solitaryforager
  40. turies reblogged this from solitaryforager
  41. innaihtsiiyi reblogged this from solitaryforager
  42. vulgardelight reblogged this from solitaryforager
  43. delicate-insanity reblogged this from solitaryforager
  44. thanksbrain reblogged this from solitaryforager
  45. grrrl-stylenow reblogged this from solitaryforager
  46. princerobbie reblogged this from solitaryforager
  47. liedtkeric reblogged this from solitaryforager

 

Reblogs